Nguyen, T H; Berstein, S; McIntyre, C and Smith, G R (2008) Customer service management practices in the homebuilding industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(1), pp. 3-17. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Studies on customer service in the homebuilding industry have demonstrated that customer satisfaction increases repeat business and, eventually, increases market share. Research efforts focusing on customer satisfaction typically determine the key attributes of satisfied buyers. From this knowledge, homebuilders can provide those services that contribute to an increased level of homebuyer satisfaction. While the knowledge of what satisfies the homebuyer is invaluable, a desire for consistency in homebuyer satisfaction would suggest that the homebuilder establish processes and procedures for customer service, which should be managed properly to ensure customer satisfaction. To better understand the customer service management practices of regional homebuilders, a survey was mailed to 92 residential contractors who were randomly selected from the member list of a local homebuilder association. This article summarizes the responses received. While the results of this study are limited to the geographic region sample, the data suggests a significant disconnect between some of the key activities recommended by the authors for quality customer service and those provided by the surveyed homebuilders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | customer service management; homebuilding practices; homebuilding quality management |
| Index terms: | market share, quality management, customer satisfaction, survey, satisfaction, customer service, key attribute, management practice |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, management, risk assessment, project delivery, market analysis, service delivery, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Quality Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here