Hein, M F and Houck, K D (2008) Construction challenges of adaptive reuse of historical buildings in Europe. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(2), pp. 115-131. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
European cities celebrate their past by preserving significant buildings that mark their history. Building preservation can range from complete restoration to adaptive reuse. While restoration is an expensive process of returning a building to its original condition, adaptive reuse is a more practical process of preserving part of a building's historical fabric, while updating it for modern uses. Adapting historical buildings creates many construction challenges, which are best addressed during pre-construction. Careful planning and creative techniques are required to meet these unique challenges. This paper addresses some of the challenges, including feasibility, construction, and structural issues of adaptive reuse of buildings using examples from four significant European projects: 1) Musee d'Orsay, Paris, 1986; 2) Tate Modern Museum, London, 2000; 3) Alter Hof, Munich, 2005; and 4) Maritim Hotel Erlweinspeicher, Dresden, 2005. All projects were visited by the authors in summer 2005 as part of a Study Abroad program sponsored by the department of Building Science at Auburn University. The paper features information and photographs gathered directly during site visits. It is an attempt to use recent projects to expand the existing body of knowledge regarding construction of adaptive reuse buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; European construction; historical buildings; preservation; restoration |
| Index terms: | pre-construction, summer, adaptive reuse, hotel, history, program, Paris, restoration, Europe, historical building, body of knowledge, London, building science |
| Subjects: | architectural and construction history, software systems, physical geography and landforms, knowledge management, sustainable design, project delivery, renovation and retrofit, engineering principles, climate science, construction type, Geography |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here