Lu, N and Liska, R W (2008) Designers' and general contractors' perceptions of offsite construction techniques in the united state construction industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 4(3), pp. 177-188. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This study examines the current use of offsite construction techniques in the building sector of the U.S. construction industry, discusses the perceptions of experienced industry practitioners regarding the benefits and barriers of using these techniques, and also identifies the top three reasons and challenges of using offsite construction techniques. The findings indicate that offsite construction techniques have not been widely used in the U.S. construction industry in 2005. The benefits of using offsite construction techniques include: 1) reducing project schedules, 2) reducing the need for skilled craft workers, 3) reducing the negative environmental impacts of construction operations, and 4) increasing the safety performance onsite. The top three reasons for using these techniques were identified as reducing: 1) the construction duration, 2) overall project schedule, and 3) the effect of incremental weather conditions. The top three challenges of using these techniques were: 1) inability to make changes in the field, 2) transportation constraints, and 3) limited design options. This study also discovers a strong, positive linear relationship between the architects/engineers' satisfaction level with offsite preassembly with the percentage of its use.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction productivity; modular buildings; offsite construction techniques; offsite preassembly; panelized building systems |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, onsite, modular building, construction operation, designer, engineer, architect, building system, option, construction productivity, duration, construction industry, general contractor, practitioner, environmental impact, safety performance, weather |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, project controls, engineering systems, air quality, profession, project delivery, building construction, practitioner, environmental impact, construction operations, operations management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Time Control, Site Management, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here