Panthi, K; Ahmed, S M and Ogunlana, S O (2009) Contingency estimation for construction projects through risk analysis. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 5(2), pp. 79-94. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Construction organizations are constantly seeking ways to avoid failure and contain risks early on in the project life-cycle. One such approach to handle risks is through the allocation of 'suitable' contingency or reserve. However, when it comes to determining this suitable contingency fund, project personnel often face difficulty. In order to provide a logical basis upon which to allocate contingency to projects, a methodology that incorporates risk assessment is presented. Based on subjective judgment sought from the project personnel regarding the likelihood and severity of risks in their project, the degree of risk of the project is determined. Contingency funds are then allocated based on this quantified degree of risk. The developed methodology was applied to a hydropower project to check the adequacy of the contingency fund allocated. All the construction risks were identified for these projects. Their effects were quantified by determining the probability and severity using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Ranging was also performed on Bill of Quantity items. An Activity/Risk factor matrix was developed, which was then used as an input to the Monte Carlo simulation to combine the risk distributions of various BOQ items. This resulted in a risk adjusted cost from which the contingency was determined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | AHP; contingency; Monte Carlo simulation; risk |
| Index terms: | estimation, Monte Carlo simulation, judgment, hydropower project, construction organization, bills of quantities, analytical hierarchy process, risk factor, risk assessment, face, personnel, risk analysis, methodology, construction project |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, decision-making and optimization, research methods, financial risk, production management, psychology, organization, construction type, management, modelling and simulation, financial and cost management, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Project Management, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here