Reposa Jr, J H (2009) Comparison of usgbc LEED for homes and the nahb national green building program. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 5(2), pp. 108-120. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This paper reviews the green certification of residential construction under Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for Homes and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) National Green Building Program, which consists of Model Green Building Guidelines and the National Green Building Standard. LEED for Homes, the NAHB Guidelines, and the Standard are applicable for single-family homes. Six of the major divisions in both LEED and the NAHB Guidelines and Standard are very similar: LEED for Homes requires prerequisites with a minimum of points in some major divisions and a minimum of total points required for each designation. The NAHB Guidelines and the Standard have some general requirements, and both require a minimum number of points for each major division for each designation level. LEED for Homes, the NAHB Guidelines and the Standard have adjustments for house size and require a minimum of two field inspections by either a Green Rater or a Verifier. Third-party inspections and testing of a building's energy efficiency appear to be critical to a project's success. The minimum additional cost to certify a green home with a base price of approximately $150,000 is approximately $7,450 for LEED for Homes, $2,550 for the Guidelines, and $2,650 for the Standard.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | green programs; LEED; nahb guidelines; nahb standard; residential construction |
| Index terms: | inspection, environmental design, energy efficiency, house size, testing, residential construction, green building guidelines, builder, green certification, green building, program |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, professional practice, practitioner, quality assurance, sustainable design, sustainability assessment, sustainability and energy, construction integration, software systems, design practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here