Ahn, Y H; Pearce, A R and Holley, P W (2009) Project delivery system for foreign manufacturers in the United States. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 5(3), pp. 149-166. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Foreign auto manufacturers and suppliers produce cars and parts in the United States not only in order to support the high demands of the U.S. market, but also to expand their market share in the largest market in the world. To produce their products, one of the first steps is to build a manufacturing plant while taking into account all the necessary rules and regulations and the different construction environment. Foreign auto manufacturers and suppliers therefore not only need to be familiar with the use of U.S. project delivery systems for the construction of new manufacturing plants and the expansion of existing manufacturing plants in the United States, but also to control potential additional risks associated with their construction caused by various factors such as cultural differences, changed laws, and regulations. This study applied a case study approach to demonstrate and compare the project delivery systems implemented for the construction of five automotive manufacturing plants in the Southeastern United States. The results of this study highlight the common practices and differences that exist with regard to project delivery systems. The conclusions derived from this case study can assist foreign manufacturers in the construction of new manufacturing plants and the expansion of existing plants in the United States, and will also provide valuable insights and considerations for U.S. construction participants who wish to work with foreign manufacturers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automobile; construction; manufacturing; project delivery system |
| Index terms: | manufacturer, project delivery, market share, case study, cultural difference, United States, regulation |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, political science, project delivery, cross-cultural studies, Geography, market analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Procurement, Governance, Roles and Professions, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here