An end user approach to teaching specifications

McFarland, A E (2010) An end user approach to teaching specifications. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(2), pp. 83-103. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

This paper presents a method for teaching specifications and estimating that emphasizes linkage of drawing content to accompanying specification information to determine project details for estimating and bidding, which are complete and which incorporate an intent or strategy for their execution. In this approach, the CSI MasterFormat is taught using an organizational approach (one that focuses on how the format is organized and how to find information within its structure) instead of a specification development approach (i.e., those approaches that teach the organizational structure of the CSI MasterFormat by having students develop specification content, then organize and write a specification(s) using the CSI MasterFormat structure). A set of non-CSI MasterFormat based specifications is used for this. Students are required to reorganize the content into specifications using the CSI MasterFormat. Thus, they must read and understand the content, and develop understanding of how CSI MasterFormat specifications are organized; two important learning objectives in Specifications courses. Linkage of specifications and drawing content and proficiency in developing descriptive job details which are complete and include execution strategy are taught and developed using a project that requires students to utilize the content of the specifications they converted into the CSI MasterFormat.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: csi masterformat; estimate detail; estimating; job detail; specifications
Index terms: linkage, drawing, bidding, organizational structure, end user, strategy, specification, estimating, estimate
Subjects: business, financial and cost management, bidding, sociology, stakeholder, management, technical documentation, contractual condition
Topics: Design Practice, Procurement, Cost Management, Contract Administration, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here