Retention of construction teachers in secondary education

McCandless, D W; Bruce, R D and Gebken, R J (2010) Retention of construction teachers in secondary education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(2), pp. 104-121. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons construction teachers left the teaching profession in their first 5 years of service, or if they stayed, the dominant factors that caused them to consider leaving the profession and the factors that were causing them to remain in the field. The researchers created a survey instrument and collected data from teachers remaining in the profession and those that left the profession. Data revealed a significant difference in the retention rate of 2-year alternatively certified teachers and 4-year teaching degreed teachers. The 4-year teaching degreed teacher had a higher retention rate. The data also revealed the only significant difference in why 2-year certified and four-year teaching degreed teachers had considered leaving the profession was the 2-year certified teachers were considering leaving because of poor opportunities for professional advancement. Considerations of stayer teachers to leave the profession included low salary, inadequate support from administration, and student issues, especially discipline and poor motivation. Over 75% of the stayer teacher responses indicated that they stayed due to the enjoyment of working with the students and seeing student success in their field followed by teacher benefits and a strong teacher retirement program.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction education; teacher retention; teacher satisfaction
Index terms: construction education, program, survey, motivation, profession, retention, satisfaction
Subjects: institututions, psychology, professional education, data collection methods, project delivery, software systems, management
Topics: Human Resources, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Education, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here