The impact of leadership effectiveness and team processes on team performance in construction

Sumner, M and Slattery, D (2010) The impact of leadership effectiveness and team processes on team performance in construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(3), pp. 179-201. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

The ability of construction professionals to work effectively as part of interdisciplinary teams is vital as the delivery of projects moves away from the traditional design-bid-build approach. This study of 27 construction professionals participating in a leadership training institute used a competitive Request for Qualifications exercise to examine whether self-assessed leadership characteristics and satisfaction with team processes were predictive of team performance as assessed by a panel of industry experts. The individual participants' leadership characteristics and satisfaction with team processes were measured using standardized, validated assessment instruments. The results of the study show that team members' satisfaction with processes such as communications, trust, problem-solving, common goals, and effective utilization of team resources were important to team effectiveness, while leadership characteristics of the individual team members were not. These findings indicate that assembling project teams composed of people who have demonstrated the ability to work well with others may be more effective than assembling a group of individuals who all have strong leadership skills. The study has implications for construction professionals participating in interdisciplinary teams because it shows that the development of effective team processes and team member satisfaction with those processes are important for team performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design-build; integrated project delivery; leadership; team processes; teaming
Index terms: team effectiveness, integrated project delivery, team performance, project team, construction professional, effectiveness, design-bid-build, satisfaction, qualification, exercise
Subjects: management, performance management, professional development, project delivery, educational resources, contractual arrangements, health behaviours and lifestyles
Topics: Information Management, Organizational Design, Procurement, Project Management, Health and Safety, Education, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here