Yi, J; Chen, H and Li, S (2010) Determination of contract time and incentive and disincentive values of highway construction projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(4), pp. 285-302. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Although ultimately bringing long term economic benefit, highway construction activities temporarily increase highway user costs and non-user costs, and affect highway safety and the environment. In order to minimize the negative effects of construction projects, state highway agencies have been using incentive/disincentive clauses in contracts to reward contractors for early completion of projects, and to recover the engineering and administrative costs incurred when contractors miss completion deadlines. Evaluation of excess user costs of traffic delays caused by the presence of work zones is essential for assessment of the impact of the work zones on the public. The estimated user costs provide highway engineers and construction managers with useful information for effective highway construction planning. For any highway construction project, there exists a construction time that would minimize the construction cost with given manpower and equipment. If the project is shortened or prolonged from this construction time, the construction cost will increase. This article shows that reasonable incentive and disincentive values can be determined by including a portion of the work zone user costs in the relationship between construction time and construction costs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contract time; incentive/disincentive; traffic delay; user cost; work zone |
| Index terms: | agency, construction project, construction manager, construction time, highway construction, presence, engineer, construction cost |
| Subjects: | project controls, sociology, civil engineering, financial and cost management, profession, production management, environmental science |
| Topics: | Time Control, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here