George, M and Sekpe, V (2010) Inspection of insulated concrete form walls using ground penetrating radar. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 6(4), pp. 303-317. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) walls have been increasingly used as an excellent alternative to traditional wall construction. ICF walls are attractive to both owners and contractors due to their superior thermal and structural performance, in addition to significant labor savings and speed of construction. However, potential voids in ICF walls-especially around plastic ties, reinforcing bars, and form corners-have been reported as a result of poor concrete consolidation. These voids could have serious negative impact on the durability, thermal efficiency, and structural performance of ICF walls. In this paper, the use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) for inspecting ICF walls is investigated. GPR is a non-destructive evaluation technique that involves the transmission of electromagnetic waves into the material under investigation and the reflections of these waves at interfaces of embedded objects to determine their location. An ICF specimen was built with air voids, steel bars, and utility pipes, and scanned with GPR to determine the accuracy of GPR in void, bar, and pipe detection. The results have indicated that GPR is an efficient and reliable technique for inspecting ICF walls. A case study of inspecting the bearing lintels in a three-story ICF building using GPR is also presented.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ground penetrating radar; inspection; insulated concrete forms; quality assurance; void detection |
| Index terms: | case study, efficiency, inspection, savings, plastic, durability, owner, investigation, reflection, evaluation technique, quality assurance, accuracy |
| Subjects: | sociology, performance management, professional development, material degradation and durability, data collection methods, quality assurance, economic analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, materials science |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here