Jiang, A and Zhu, Y (2011) Life cycle cost analysis of residential grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems in Florida. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(1), pp. 71-81. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The main concern for adopting solar PV is the cost of PV systems and their higher unit price than grid price. This study uses four cities in Florida as cases to investigate the life-cycle cost, in the form of equivalent annual cost (EAC), and unit electricity price of various scenarios that apply solar photovoltaic (PV) system technologies to residential buildings. The study shows that currently the EAC of using distributed standalone PV systems increases when more electricity is generated by such systems. The unit electricity price is essentially determined by the aggregate unit price of electricity, which includes two parts, electricity consumption of a residence from both grid and PV systems. When the unit electricity price is less than the unit grid price during the study period, the investment on PV system becomes feasible. However, other factors may have a great impact on the life cycle cost including the cost of batteries, the replacement cycle of batteries and inverters, net metering, and rebate and incentive programs. The analyses in this study suggest that properly handling those factors may lead to a significant cost reduction, which in turn makes PV systems more affordable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affordability; equivalent annual cost; life cycle cost; solar photovoltaic system; unit electricity price |
| Index terms: | replacement, electricity consumption, photovoltaic, residential building, aggregate, life cycle cost analysis, program, affordability, life cycle cost, cost reduction |
| Subjects: | research methods, materials science, energy systems, software systems, economic analysis, economics, construction type |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here