Farrow, C B; Liu, J and Tatum, M C (2011) Curriculum delivery and assessment for net generation construction students. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(2), pp. 109-125. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The Net Generation of students, born between 1980 and 2000, has transitioned into the college classroom and beyond. Universities have recognized that the typical Net Generation student is different than predecessors. Technology, elementary and high school instruction, and parental expectations and involvement are vastly different than previous generations. As construction management programs consider how best to educate the next generation of constructors, this research sought to determine how the Net Generation would prefer college construction classes to be delivered and assessed. Traditional construction management classes have been delivered by the "wise" professor at center stage. Knowledge has been delivered using lectures and=or Powerpoint1 slides. Research shows that such lectured based models may not be the best educational delivery method to reach the Net Generation. Some of these researchers are even predicting a shift in the teaching paradigm across all of higher education. This project sought to compare the established research on the Net Generation in aggregate with students in the McWhorter School of Building Science at Auburn University. Four focus groups of undergraduate students were used to establish results. Results indicate that construction management students generally agree with the established research on curriculum delivery and assessment for the Net Generation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | curriculum; millennials; net generation; student preferences; teaching strategy |
| Index terms: | focus group, strategy, classroom, program, preference, building science, traditional construction, delivery method, aggregate, higher education, undergraduate, paradigm |
| Subjects: | software systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, educational institutions, delivery method, data collection methods, decision-making and reasoning, heritage and conservation, engineering principles, construction type, materials science, curriculum development |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Education, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here