Smith, J P; Miller, K; Christofferson, J and Hutchings, M (2011) Best practices for dealing with price volatility in utah's residential construction market. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(3), pp. 210-225. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Price volatility is a problem that affects each discipline involved in the residential construction industry. The myriad factors that can have an impact on construction costs are such that it is extremely hard to anticipate upcoming changes in a timely and accurate way. When prices fluctuate during the course of a project, estimates become erroneous and completion of projects within expected budgets becomes difficult. Increasing prices typically leave contractors with the majority of the risk burden due to the enforceability of contracts were likely executed months prior. Numerous methods have been developed for managing the risk of price volatility. The various methods available are implemented based on the disciplines involved, the types of contracts being used, and the existing market conditions. Typical practices transfer the risk of price volatility to other involved disciplines, be it the owner, the contractor, subcontractors, or suppliers. However, no method has proven completely effective at removing the risks associated with price volatility. Involved disciplines need to utilize a combination of best practices to protect themselves. They need to coordinate and communicate with the other disciplines to ensure that the risk of price volatility is appropriately accounted for and managed throughout the construction process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fluctuation; price; residential construction; volatility |
| Index terms: | subcontractor, construction process, best practice, market condition, residential construction, construction cost, estimate, owner |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, construction integration, economic and policy analysis, sociology, building construction, business, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Site Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here