Using design-based change orders as a lessons learned metric in university dormitory construction

Stone, M L; Johnson, P W and Leopard, T A (2011) Using design-based change orders as a lessons learned metric in university dormitory construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(3), pp. 226-240. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

The enrollment at The University of Alabama has increased substantially in recent years and the University is expanding to meet the growing demands. The expansion includes four dormitory complexes built within the past 5 years. Change orders considerably influenced the final cost of the first and second dormitory projects and the University initiated the current study to follow-up on a global change order study that previously examined new construction on campus. The current study analyzed the reasons for the change and what Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) Division the change represented. While it was determined that the largest source of change orders on dormitory projects were owner initiated, these changes have not been targeted for reduction since they are at the discretion of the University and can be beneficial to the project. To gauge the performance of the change management program currently in place at the University, the direct impact on the total project cost due to changes resulting from design errors were analyzed for all four dormitory projects. The author hopes that the recommendations in this study will aid universities and colleges by providing a means to gather, track, and analyze changes that occur during the construction of dormitory projects and show how the lessons learned from the change orders during these projects can potentially reduce costs on future projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change orders; lessons learned
Index terms: owner, design error, change order, project cost, dormitory, lessons learned, specification, enrolment, change management, program
Subjects: economics, sociology, software systems, professional development, construction type, professional practice, management, contractual condition, recruitment and enrolment
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Information Management, Education, Construction Technology, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here