Weidman, J E; Miller, K R; Christofferson, J P and Newitt, J S (2011) Best practices for dealing with price volatility in commercial construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(4), pp. 276-293. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
In the commercial construction industry, the problem of price volatility as it pertains to materials and labor is a consistent problem. The changing instability of market conditions presents a challenge for construction companies to accurately estimate and complete projects within budget. This volatility can lead to higher costs and more risk to suppliers, contractors, and owners which can cause financial distress for all parties involved in the construction process. Volatility in construction will continue to be a risk that participants in the construction industry will face. Price volatility can be economically dangerous when price changes affect the assumptions on which the contract is based. In an effort to identify the best practices being used by parties in the commercial construction industry for dealing with the risk of price fluctuation, panel members consisting of construction industry experts in the state of Utah were given rounds of questionnaires. This research report summarizes the responses of these industry professionals as to what they feel the best practices for dealing with the risks volatility creates in construction. Among the best practices given by the panel members were timely buyout, contract language, stockpiling materials, proposal time expirations, and good communication.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; fluctuation; price; volatility |
| Index terms: | estimate, construction industry, financial distress, best practice, commercial construction, owner, construction process, questionnaire, face, market condition, construction company, proposal |
| Subjects: | building construction, project planning, economic analysis, psychology, construction type, organization, industry analysis, sociology, financial and cost management, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Project Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here