Superintendent competencies and attributes required for success: A national study comparing construction professionals' opinions

Gunderson, D E and Gloeckner, G W (2011) Superintendent competencies and attributes required for success: A national study comparing construction professionals' opinions. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 7(4), pp. 294-311. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

This article describes the results of the culmination of three phases of exploratory sequential mixed methods research intended to determine the competencies and attributes required by a construction superintendent to be successful. In the third research phase, surveys were completed by 469 participants working in commercial, residential, heavy-civil, mechanical, electrical, metal stud and drywall aspects of the construction industry in the United States. The high response rate may indicate interest in the subject. Participants included superintendents, project managers, project engineers, vice presidents, presidents and others working in various positions in the construction industry. The results indicate there is very little difference in the perceptions of participants as to the most important competencies and attributes required for a construction superintendent to be successful. There are only nine out of the 42 competencies and attributes with any significant statistical difference in importance as perceived by construction professionals. There was no statistical difference in the first 23 ranked items. This reveals consistency in the opinions of people working as superintendents, project managers, vice presidents, or presidents.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction skills; construction superintendent; construction supervision; mixed methods research; project superintendent
Index terms: survey, United States, project engineer, project manager, mixed method, construction industry, supervision, metal, construction professional
Subjects: professional development, traditional and composite building materials, industry analysis, control systems, profession, data collection methods, Geography
Topics: Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 3 PTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here