Two-plus-two construction management programs and articulation agreements

Chen, Q; Christy, A; Owens, M; Bortz, D; Greene, W and King, B (2012) Two-plus-two construction management programs and articulation agreements. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(1), pp. 4-25. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

To meet workforce needs of U.S. industries, colleges and universities nationwide are increasingly being asked to develop better 2 + 2 programs and articulation agreements to guide a smooth transfer of students between 2-year and 4-year institutions. However, creating a good articulation agreement can be a challenging task. This article presents two case studies of formal articulation agreements between a 4-year and two 2-year construction management programs. In the case studies, the two articulation agreements provided means to formalize the transfer process for coursework and facilitate the transition for students from one campus to the other. The well designed matrices of course equivalencies allowed students to complete part of their coursework at either the 4-year or 2-year institution and earn both associate and bachelor's degrees within four years. By performing statistical analysis and comparisons of 2 + 2 transfer and non-transfer students' grade point average (GPA), this research found that in both cases the transfer students had maintained good academic performance in the 4-year program when compared with non-transfer students. This was deemed as a positive indicator for the success of the two 2 + 2 programs and articulation agreements in keeping the continuity of coursework and preparing students for higher level courses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: articulation agreement; construction education; construction project management; transfer students; two-plus-two
Index terms: academic performance, construction project management, case study, construction education, program, grade point average, agreements, statistical analysis
Subjects: software systems, data science, professional education, project management theory and practice, contract formation, data collection methods, assessment methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Education, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here