Shane, J; del Puerto, C L; Strong, K; Mauro, K and Wiley-Jones, R (2012) Retaining women students in a construction engineering undergraduate program by balancing integration and identity in student communities. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(3), pp. 171-185. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
A key to student retention and satisfaction is to provide mechanisms that integrate the students into a program or profession yet still preserve and develop key identity factors important to the students. Integration involves common values, shared goals, uniform curricula, and linkages to upperclass students, alumni, and industry partners. Identity is generally developed through involvement with extracurricular student groups, such as Women In Construction, Emerging Green Builders, and Society of Women Engineers. Providing a student experience that offers a balance between integration and identity will be effective in recruiting and retaining women students while maintaining rigorous academic and professional standards required by accrediting agencies and industry advisory boards. This article presents the results of a structured system of both curricular and extracurricular activities implemented at a large Midwestern university to retain women undergraduate students in a construction engineering program. Implementing a first year learning community, hiring women faculty and staff, and creating student groups and functions tailored specifically to women have all contributed to significant increases in women student enrollments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | curriculum; retention; women in construction |
| Index terms: | enrolment, profession, retention, society, builder, program, agency, women, student experience, engineer, integration, linkage, construction engineering, satisfaction, undergraduate, identity |
| Subjects: | student development, software systems, engineering methods, business, practitioner, curriculum development, communities and social development, organizational analysis, recruitment and enrolment, profession, management, project delivery, sociology, institututions |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Education, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here