Application of safety project interview data to a cyclical research model of translation

McCoy, A P; Saunders, L; Kleiner, B and Blismas, N (2012) Application of safety project interview data to a cyclical research model of translation. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 8(4), pp. 260-280. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

There is growing debate over the need for academic research to produce applied. For example, funding agencies, such as the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) are emphasizing direct relationships with industry, and the need to contain research methods that are targeted, useful, and mutually beneficial. Applied academic research does not always translate into successful industry practice, let alone adoption, and vice versa. Many studies have explored barriers based on either academic or industrial variables, or both. Several attempts have been made to analyze barriers and propose solutions to address the translation of applied research into practice. One previously designed model, by researchers from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) and Virginia Tech, in particular, considers translation as an iterative approach to establish research-to-practice-to-research (r2p2r) as a "translational research model," creating an iterative relationship between academia and industry. While this model is currently theoretical in nature, this work proposes a process for collecting, translating and demonstrating reliability of data, along the previous r2p2r cycle, for 9 in-depth interviews of applied safety research pilot projects. Ultimately, this work is to set the stage for further insight into impediments and fragmentation between academic research and industry adoption in practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: industry; innovation; pilot projects; r2p2r; research translation
Index terms: agency, research translation, funding, fragmentation, safety research, occupational safety and health, interview, academia
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, sociology, knowledge management, educational institutions, data collection methods, economic analysis, business
Topics: Research Practice, Education, Business Strategy, Information Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here