Teaching sustainability through service-learning in construction education

Clevenger, C M and Ozbek, M E (2013) Teaching sustainability through service-learning in construction education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(1), pp. 3-18. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

In Spring 2011, under the umbrella of a departmental initiative called CM Cares, faculty from Colorado State University collaborated with a local design professional and high school to offer an experimental service-learning course to engage at-risk teens within the local community through completion of a hands-on construction project, and to empower construction management university students to be leaders, stewards and mentors by managing a small community-based construction project. In the course, university students worked with local, alternative high school students in their building trades shop class to construct two full-scale sustainable dog houses for the Rocky Mountain Great Dane Rescue Mission. In its pilot offering, the course met with significant success and several participants received university awards. The purpose of this research is to present this course as a case study to examine successful strategies and barriers to implementing service-learning in construction education to teach sustainability. Assessment of such engagement was performed using reflections and informal interviews, pre- and post-course surveys, and concept maps. Findings suggest that this service-learning course has the potential to meaningfully engage both university and at-risk high school students and to increase their interest in, and knowledge of sustainability and community action.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: community action; construction education; service-learning; sustainability
Index terms: interview, concept map, construction project, reflection, mentors, survey, construction education, community-based, community action, building trade, case study, university student, strategy
Subjects: practitioner, data collection methods, production management, curriculum design, decision analysis, management, communities and social development, professional development, professional education
Topics: Risk Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Education, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here