Kramer, S W and Sommer, J (2013) An initial look at motivations & personality traits of American construction professionals working for international firms. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(1), pp. 39-60. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This quantitative research study explored why American construction professionals choose to live and work overseas. In other words, what are the motivating factors that attribute not only to the willingness of U.S. employees to accept expatriate positions, but also the ability to see projects through to completion? As international corporate activities increase, the staffing of their operations involves more strategic concerns. However, foreign assignments have many differences, and dissatisfaction with host countries is a known cause of expatriate failure (Chen, Tzeng, & Tang, 2005). In fact, failure rates have been estimated to range from 25% to 40% and associated costs for each failure is estimated from $55,000 to $85,000 (Mendenhall & Oddou, 1985).The following general themes were examined through a 26-question web-based survey: (1) What initially motivated you to try overseas construction work? (2) What motivates you to continue working overseas? and (3) What personality traits are essential to a successful overseas construction career?Employees from nine international design and construction firms were surveyed and the results were analyzed to form conclusions that may be helpful to human resource departments and managers of international construction operations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | career; expatriates; international construction; motivation |
| Index terms: | construction professional, manager, international firm, personality, survey, design and construction, human resource, construction work, international construction, quantitative research, motivation, career |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, psychology, data analysis and analytics, management, strategic management, data collection methods, operations management, behavioral psychology, practitioner, professional development |
| Topics: | Project Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Human Resources, Information Management, International Construction, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here