Irizarry, J; Gheisari, M; Zolfagharian, S and Meadati, P (2013) Human computer interaction modes for construction education applications: Experimenting with small format interactive displays. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(2), pp. 83-101. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The increasing use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a tool for communicating design intent in the architecture engineering and construction (AEC) industry has increased the demand for BIM related instruction in Construction programs. For this reason, the importance of including BIM tools in courses is greater now than ever. However, due to limited course time and the great amount of applications and hardware available, it is important to select those tools that have the potential to provide a better user experience, which may lead to enhanced student learning. This article discusses the results of research undertaken to evaluate various hardware options and Human Computer Interaction (HCI) modes that may be beneficial for teaching with BIM related applications in construction education environments. Interactive display technologies have the potential to greatly enhance the educational experience of students, and will provide faculty a tool that can facilitate teaching construction concepts in a more visual and interactive manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; construction education; human computer interaction; instructional technology; interactive displays |
| Index terms: | hardware, option, building information modelling, construction education, program, user experience, instructional technology, human-computer interaction |
| Subjects: | human-computer interaction, professional education, computer hardware, user-centered design, information systems, decision analysis, educational technology, software systems |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Education, Digital Applications, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here