Hein, M F; Dougherty, M and Hobbs, T (2013) Cleaning methods for pervious concrete pavements. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(2), pp. 102-116. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Pervious concrete paving systems increasingly are being applied as environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional impervious pavements. Pervious concrete (PC) systems have been shown to effectively reduce negative environmental impacts associated with impervious pavements, including stormwater pollution, noise, heat island effects, and soil erosion. Keeping PC pavements viable requires maintaining their ability to infiltrate water. The porous nature of PC invites solids such as soil particles and organic matter carried in storm runoff to become trapped in the surface over time, gradually decreasing infiltration rate (IR). The pavement, if left unmaintained, will become increasingly clogged. Since no standardized recommendation for cleaning PC currently exists, water management agencies in some states do not provide stormwater management credit for using PC systems. This research studied the effectiveness of power blowing, pressure washing, and vacuuming, as well as a combination of these methods for restoring IR on small area PC pavements. This study finds that pressure washing and vacuuming are equally effective as initial cleaning techniques, both increasing surface IR by over 90%. Combining vacuuming and pressure washing offers substantial gains over either method alone. These results are important for owners of small area PC pavements who have access to limited equipment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | clogging; maintenance; pervious concrete pavements; storm water runoff; stormwater management |
| Index terms: | infiltration, water management, owner, paving, stormwater, agency, effectiveness, environmental impact, pollution, environmentally friendly, cleaning |
| Subjects: | environmental science, performance management, environmental engineering, transportation engineering, environmental impact, sustainable design, environmental health, sociology, environmental resource management, maintenance engineering |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here