Azhar, S; Lukkad, M Y and Ahmad, I (2013) An investigation of critical factors and constraints for selecting modular construction over conventional stick-built technique. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(3), pp. 203-225. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Recent advances in manufacturing methods, construction equipment, information technology tools, and project delivery systems have resulted in increased use of prefabrication and modularization. This research study identifies critical factors and constraints that can help designers, engineers, and constructors in selecting modular construction over the conventional "stick-built" technique for commercial building projects. The decision-making process of selecting one construction method over another is complex and based on a number of factors, some of which are site conditions, skilled labor availability, transportation conditions, organizational readiness, local codes, project schedule and budget, sustainability requirements, and design complexity. The aim of this study is to identify the most critical factors and constraints that must be considered by the decision-makers for selecting modular or stick-built construction. The study employed a mixed methods research design and was divided into three phases. In the first phase, through an in-depth literature review and interviews with six industry professionals, ninety seven decision-making factors and forty three constraints were identified. In the following phase, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine their quantitative ratings and rakings. In the final phase, with the help of a focus group of five modular construction experts, twelve critical decision-making factors and six major constraints were shortlisted and validated. It is hoped that the findings will help the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry in making informed decisions about the appropriate construction method selection.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | manufactured construction; mixed methods research; model-driven prefabrication; modular construction; productivity |
| Index terms: | engineer, productivity, decision-making process, research design, designer, critical factor, construction equipment, mixed method, prefabrication, project delivery, modularization, investigation, literature review, survey, construction method, skilled labour, interview, focus group, information technology, complexity, modular construction, commercial building, decision-making, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | building construction, construction type, management, construction equipment, decision analysis, systems engineering, research design and methodology, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession, computing systems, project delivery, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Plant and Equipment, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Site Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here