Sewalk, S and Nietfeld, K (2013) Barriers preventing women from enrolling in construction management programs. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 9(4), pp. 239-255. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The construction industry does not attract significant numbers of women to its labor force. However, due to potential expected growth in the field, construction companies will need more women to meet their labor needs. Much research has been done on women in the construction industry and factors preventing them from entering the industry, however, this article examines the academic side and ask what factors are preventing more women from choosing construction management as a major in college. We undertook this study by contacting all of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) and asking questions regarding their programs in an attempt to discover any correlations that would provide information on approaches to attract more women to college-level construction management programs. Unfortunately, we only found a few small positive correlations between average enrollment of women and number of women faculty, availability of women support groups, and graduation rates of women. We believe the biggest factors acting as barriers to more women pursuing construction management as a career are the perceptions and stereotypes of the industry and that the industry needs to focus on changing those perceptions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management education; women in construction |
| Index terms: | construction management education, construction company, labour force, program, career, stereotype, enrolment, construction industry, women |
| Subjects: | professional education, organization, industry analysis, sociology, recruitment and enrolment, professional development, economics, software systems |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Education, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here