Comparison of environmental responsibility of construction management students based on exposure to sustainability in curricula and on campus

Celik, B G; Ozbek, M E; Attaran, S and Jalili, M (2014) Comparison of environmental responsibility of construction management students based on exposure to sustainability in curricula and on campus. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(2), pp. 96-110. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Universities around the world are focusing more on sustainability, not only in their academic education but also in the overall administration of their campuses. Sustainability is becoming more important for both students and the employers hiring them upon graduation. Specifically in programs such as architecture, engineering, and construction management (CM), the focus on environmental responsibility is increasing faster due to increased regulations, codes of ethics, and increasing opportunities for practicing green building knowledge upon graduation. While the efforts both at the curriculum level and at the whole campus level to promote sustainability have been increasing, it is not yet fully determined how effective these approaches are in advancing the environmental responsibility of students. This study presents the results of a survey to measure the environmental responsibility of subjects from three different groups of students studying CM at two different universities with different records of sustainability initiatives. The results of this study reveal that CM programs can significantly strengthen students' environmental responsibility by adding sustainability course(s) into higher education curricula. This study was unable to identify a positive and linear relationship between a university's sustainability record and its students' environmental responsibility.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction education: environmental responsibility: sustainability: university campus
Index terms: survey, regulation, green building, construction education, program, exposure, becoming, higher education, ethics
Subjects: political science, educational institutions, software systems, public and environmental health, design practice, data collection methods, philosophical process, professional education, ethical practice
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Governance, Research Practice, Education, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here