Learning from the cathedral hill hospital project during the design and preconstruction phases

Lostuvali, B; Alves, T C L and Modrich, R U (2014) Learning from the cathedral hill hospital project during the design and preconstruction phases. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(3), pp. 160-180. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

This article explores opportunities and limitations of implementing and experimenting with Lean Product Development ideas and practices in the design and engineering of a complex hospital project. In this environment, new forms of contracts have given rise to new forms of organizing teams to deliver capital projects in which architects, engineers, and contractors are co-located to promote collaboration and deliver projects with a strong focus on clients' needs. The Cathedral Hill Hospital (CHH) project is a 1.2 million square feet urban replacement hospital in San Francisco, California. It is not just designed to be a state-of-the-art hospital but also to break new grounds in multiple areas of design, construction and operations. Since the beginning of project validation in 2007, the Integrated Project Delivery Team has been applying and testing Lean ideas, concepts, tools and processes to develop this very complex project. The article's nurturing proposition is that CHH has implemented most principles related to the Lean product development system at Toyota, and that these principles are the foundation for the evolving operational system that supports its processes on a daily basis. The article contributes to the literature by providing an account of how different processes worked in a co-located environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: information flow: integrated form of agreement: leadership: lean: learning: product development
Index terms: product development, architect, form of contract, information flow, validation, complex project, replacement, capital project, integrated project delivery, collaboration, testing, engineer, state of the art
Subjects: materials science, research dissemination and communication, profession, innovation studies, contractual arrangements, information systems, professional development, strategic project management, professional practice, management
Topics: Procurement, Project Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here