Bigelow, B F; Saseendran, A and Elliott, J W (2018) Attracting students to construction education programs: An exploration of perceptions by gender. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(3), pp. 179-197. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Demand for construction managers is considerable and is projected to grow through the next decade. To meet the demand for construction managers, construction management programs will have to produce enough graduates. However, to produce graduates, programs must first attract students to their programs. This study collected data from students enrolled in a construction management (CM) degree program at multiple universities to learn about their perceptions of factors that attracted them to a construction management degree program. A comparative analysis was performed to identify differences in influential factors by gender. The results indicate that very few differences exist, in regard to the factors that attract students to construction degree programs, between male and female students. It was also found that while all factors identified were positively influential, there are substantial differences between the factors regarding how many students they reach and their level of positive influence. Career opportunities was found to be the most influential factor in attracting students of both genders to CM programs, followed by, internships, non-internship work experience, and fieldtrips to job sites. Factors were also identified for CM programs trying to increase their female enrolment to focus on.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction education; gender; graduates; recruiting |
| Index terms: | comparative analysis, construction manager, exploration, construction education, influential factor, career, program, internship, enrolment |
| Subjects: | environmental resource management, professional education, risk assessment, profession, data analysis and analytics, software systems, professional development, recruitment and enrolment |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Risk Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here