Understanding the underrepresentation of qualitative research approaches to built environment research in Nigeria

Umeokafor, N and Windapo, A O (2018) Understanding the underrepresentation of qualitative research approaches to built environment research in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(3), pp. 198-217. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

There is evidence that scholars in some countries, including Nigeria, primarily employ the quantitative approach to research, and that in some cases this approach is used inappropriately. This leaves research questions that should be tackled from a qualitative standpoint either unaddressed or incorrectly addressed. The aim of this study is to understand why the qualitative approach (QA) has failed to gain similar recognition in Nigeria and other countries, and by extension, the disposition of researchers towards its use. The impact of the disposition of researchers toward QA was also explored. Researchers in the various built environment (BE) disciplines in Nigeria were interviewed. The results revealed that there is a preference for quantitative research, while QAs are used if convenient. Furthermore, the study revealed that the educational background of academics and their poor understanding of the qualitative paradigm explain their disposition toward the adoption of the QA in research. This finding suggests that academic followers instead of leaders are being produced, and that research is done for ad hominem promotion. In advancing the understanding of QA in BE research in Nigeria, this study also draws the attention of stakeholders in the academia to the implications of a preference by researchers for quantitative research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; interpretivism; Nigeria; qualitative research; research methodology
Index terms: preference, built environment research, evidence, qualitative research, interpretivism, academia, built environment, research methodology, paradigm, Nigeria, qualitative approach, quantitative research, promotion
Subjects: research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, management, education and knowledge transfer, infrastructure and transport systems, educational institutions, evaluation and assessment methods, Geography, theoretical framing, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, research management
Topics: Geographical Context, Education, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here