Burgett, J M; Perrenoud, A and Smith, J P (2018) Identification and prioritization of critical subject matter within mechanical systems curriculum in construction management education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 14(4), pp. 295-312. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
In order for students graduating with construction-related undergraduate degrees to provide immediate and effective benefit to their employers, program curricula must accurately reflect the needs of the industry. One area of the typical construction management curriculum that receives a varying level of emphasis and consideration amongst accredited programs is Mechanical Systems. Similarly, the wide range of possible topics and concepts relevant to mechanical systems receive varying levels of attention. The purpose of this research was to identify what mechanical system topics and concepts were perceived by industry partners as being most important for graduating construction students to know. Construction industry professionals were surveyed to determine what topics they believed warranted prioritization in mechanical system courses. Results indicate that topics related to Contract Administration (e.g., plan and specification reading, MEP coordination, submittal review, etc.) and How HVAC Systems Work (e.g., differences between HVAC system types, HVAC equipment, etc.) were comparatively the most important topics for students to have a knowledge of. Instructors of mechanical systems classes should use these findings to determine what major subject areas to focus on, and allocate time to the various specific concepts appropriately within the constraints of their individual program.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction education; environmental systems; HVAC; mechanical systems; student learning outcomes |
| Index terms: | construction management education, instructor, specification, submittal, program, construction education, contract administration, construction industry, learning outcome, coordination, mechanical system, undergraduate |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, practitioner, professional education, contract management, mechanical systems, student development, industry analysis, software systems, management, professional development, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Education, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here