Poon, J (2019) Examining graduate built environment student satisfaction in the UK. What matters the most? International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 15(3), pp. 179-197. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to establish an evaluation of graduate built environment student satisfaction in the UK. The data used for this paper is from Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES). Exploratory factor analysis was used to produce the list of student satisfaction factors. Six student satisfaction factors were identified, including Quality of staff and course (F1), Student learning environment (F2), Personal development of students (F3), Student services (F4), Appropriate assessment (F5) and Clear expectation (F6). Multiple and hierarchical regression analysis was used to identify the level of influence of demographic variables on each of the student satisfaction factors and the level of statistically significant prediction of individual student satisfaction factors on overall student satisfaction. Quality of staff and course is the most important factor influencing built environment student satisfaction. Attendance type is the only demographic factor which is statistically significant but has a negative impact on built environment student satisfaction. This paper’s contribution to literature is in the area of identifying some important elements for enhancing student satisfaction which universities can take on board for developing a strategy to enhance student satisfaction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; postgraduate taught experience survey; student satisfaction |
| Index terms: | student satisfaction, postgraduate, strategy, demographic variable, survey, exploratory factor analysis, regression analysis, demographic factor, personal development, built environment |
| Subjects: | demography, data collection methods, professional development, management, higher education, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, professions and roles |
| Topics: | Education, Urban Studies, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here