Smithwick, J B; Schleifer, T C; Sawyer, J T and Sullivan, K T (2019) Quantifying the impact of the great recession on the AEC industry: A call to reevaluate home office overhead costs. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 15(3), pp. 198-215. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The 2007–2009 recession significantly affected the U.S. construction industry, with unemployment peaking at approximately 20%. In such circumstances, construction companies must devise strategies to adapt to and even counteract declining revenue. One tactic is to reduce home office overhead costs, such as bonuses, rent, and business development expenses. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which construction companies reduced overhead costs in response to a market downturn, and whether these reductions are correlated with companies’ demographic attributes. A total of 437 contractors across the United States completed a survey on how much their companies reduced expenses; 92% of the respondents reported that their companies reduced overhead in at least one area, by an average of about 15%. Companies with revenue of $100.1 million to $500 million and that primarily performed manufacturing work tended to reduce overhead costs more than other types of construction companies. This study also reveals that larger companies made fewer reductions to overhead, with the exception being roofers who made very minimal reductions regardless of their annual revenue. The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry can use the data presented in this study to anticipate reductions in overhead spending that future distressed market conditions may necessitate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | company size; financial management; home office overhead; recession |
| Index terms: | financial management, demographic attribute, recession, roofer, construction industry, survey, construction company, revenue, strategy, market condition, United States, business development, unemployment |
| Subjects: | organization, practitioner, economic analysis, Geography, demography, data collection methods, business, economic and policy analysis, management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here