McWhirter, N and Shealy, T (2020) Case-based flipped classroom approach to teach sustainable infrastructure and decision-making. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(1), pp. 3-23. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Design, engineering, and construction for more sustainable infrastructure involve complex decisions with considerable risk and uncertainty. To prepare students for such challenges, agencies and organizations like the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, American Council for Construction Education, and American Society of Civil Engineers are placing more emphasis on complex engineering problems. The case-based module in this study aims to address such needs through a constructivism framework, integrating problem-based learning, a flipped classroom, and transdisciplinary content on behavioral science. The module presents a case about a wastewater project. Team-based learning involves proposing the placement of holding-tanks, first based on cost and later for an extreme flood. Three decision-making concepts (risk aversion, regulatory focus, take-the-best heuristic) are then taught. Students wrote individual reflections relating these concepts to the case. Initially, students perceived cost as the biggest barrier. After the module, students broadened their consideration to include risk aversion and regulatory focus theory. Students were more likely to consider resilience in their design and reflect on how their design would influence the community. The implications of these results are that teaching transdisciplinary concepts that bridge engineering and behavioral science can broaden students’ understanding of sustainability and change perceptions of the barriers for more sustainable infrastructure. The module is available through the Center for Sustainable Engineering repository.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | active learning; decision-making; flipped classroom; professional issues; sustainable infrastructure |
| Index terms: | active learning, heuristic, professional issue, module, reflection, placing, problem-based learning, civil engineer, science, society, placement, agency, construction education, decision-making, classroom |
| Subjects: | specialized education, institututions, construction type, architectural elements, communities and social development, professional education, learning methods, profession, risk assessment, teaching methods, professional development, concrete and cementitious materials, management, decision analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Education, Risk Management, Design Practice, Human Resources, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here