Kermanshachi, S; Dao, B; Rouhanizadeh, B; Shane, J and Anderson, S (2020) Development of the project complexity assessment and management framework for heavy industrial projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(1), pp. 24-42. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Complexity is a term applied throughout the project management field, and project complexity typically presents additional management challenges to achieving project objectives. Without an appropriate approach to assess and manage project complexity, project teams frequently face difficulties in executing their projects. This study provides a framework to develop a tool which can effectively measure and assess complexity levels of a project. This tool was designed with a “Complexity Measurement Matrix”, and is comprised of 37 complexity indicators (CIs) which have proven to be significant to describing project complexity. The complexity measurement scales were developed by normalizing data gathered from a survey of 44 completed projects. The weight factors of the 37 CIs were calculated based on three rounds of Delphi method. The developed tool generates a set of comprehensive reports and provides users with the overall project complexity level, a series of radar diagrams describing the most important indicators, and associated strategies to manage each indicator. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a pioneering approach to assessing project complexity and aids practitioners in facilitating project complexity management processes identifying the most important complexity contributors and focusing on managing complexity-associated challenges.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity assessment; complexity management; complexity quantification; project complexity |
| Index terms: | quantification, Delphi method, project team, project management, strategy, face, survey, practitioner, body of knowledge, project complexity, complexity |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data collection methods, systems engineering, measurement and scaling, project management theory and practice, management, knowledge management, psychology, practitioner, organizational theory |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here