Dawson, S and Osborne, A (2020) Re-shaping built environment higher education: The impact of degree apprenticeships in England. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(2), pp. 102-116. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The Richard Review of the United Kingdoms (UK) Apprenticeships in 2012 proposed degree apprenticeships (DA) as a new model for the unification of academic and vocational learning. Apprenticeships have long been acknowledged as a practical vehicle to develop the vocational skills and educational achievements of the UK employee resource. The UK Government set a target of 3 million apprenticeship starts between 2015 and 2020. In order for higher education institutions (HEI) to participate in the new apprenticeship marketplace, they need to consider distinct factors that do not surface in traditional Bachelors programmes. Cognizant of these challenges this paper evaluates the development of the new degree apprenticeship programmes for built environment education through the research lens of HEI. This paper evaluates extant literature and primary data collected from qualitative interviews carried out across the UK HEI sector during 2017. Research findings are presented following analysis using NVivo. Narratives on the barriers, benefits, and opportunities, of degree apprenticeships, including academic quality assurance, governance, and pedagogic dimensions are presented. The findings include industry designed curriculum producing a different graduate output, redefining the purpose of HE, restructuring governance and resource, additional contractual obligations for stakeholders and the embedding of work-based learning strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; benefits; built environment; degree apprenticeships |
| Index terms: | work-based learning, dimension, built environment, higher education, governance, higher education institution, England, built environment education, apprenticeship, narrative, quality assurance, programme, United Kingdom, strategy, interview |
| Subjects: | Geography, quality assurance, professional education, professional development, qualitative and interpretive research, management, infrastructure and transport systems, educational institutions, project controls, learning methods, business, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Education, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance, Urban Studies, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here