Learning space design: The presentation of a framework for the built environment discipline

Wilson, H K and Cotgrave, A J (2020) Learning space design: The presentation of a framework for the built environment discipline. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(2), pp. 132-148. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

This paper reports on research undertaken to identify the specific learning space preferences of built environment students within a UK university. Through an instrumental case study design, utilizing a sequential exploratory mixed methods approach, this research explored learning space requirements for built environment students. Initial focus groups were conducted to identify elements of the learning spaces that are important in students learning spaces, which were then used to develop questions for the survey phase of the research. From this, we proceeded to develop a framework for learning space design for built environment students. Eight important learning space factors were identified; access to space, convenient workspaces, environment, layout, sense, integrated space, esthetics, and identity. Initial findings are presented regarding differences between disciplines in their rating of elements of the learning space. A framework is presented for practitioners to use in the design process for the development of built environment disciplines learning spaces. This research adds to current understanding regarding student-centered learning and workplace research, highlighting preferences for specific learning space factors. The current research is part of a bigger study but presents built environment disciplines outcomes which are applicable to a larger group.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; learning environment; physical space; student centered; university buildings
Index terms: workspace, learning space, case study, mixed method, student-centered, built environment, identity, survey, design process, focus group, preference, practitioner
Subjects: student experience, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, management, design methods, data collection methods, decision-making and reasoning, practitioner, construction type
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Education
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here