Perrenoud, A J (2020) Delphi approach to identifying best practices for succession planning within construction firms. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(3), pp. 197-210. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Succession planning serves to develop and retain workers at all levels of employment. Retaining high performers is critical to a contractor’s success. The nature of the construction industry creates unique difficulties for retaining employees internally. High turnover is common within construction companies, noticeably with high performers. Currently, the industry is experiencing a significant workforce shortage and it is becoming increasingly harder to find qualified workers. To help reduce contractor’s risk of high turnover, the Construction Industry Institute (CII) appointed a research panel to identify best practices for succession planning in the construction industry. CII identified 10 Human Resource (HR) executives from large North American construction companies to participate in the research panel. With the aim of identifying best practices in succession planning, the researcher conducted a three-round Delphi study with the research panel. The panel came to a consensus on 15 practices that have the highest value for succession planning in the construction industry. During the three rounds, the panel ordered the 15 practices in perceived value by using their 212 years of combined HR experience in the construction industry. Construction companies can incorporate the practices during the five common stages of succession planning.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labor issues; succession planning; talent management; workforce development |
| Index terms: | best practice, executive, construction industry, Delphi method, succession planning, becoming, employment, Construction Industry Institute, human resource, workforce development, turnover, construction firm, construction company |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, professional development, management, industry analysis, practitioner, research organizations, organization, business management, philosophical process |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here