Turner, M and Simmons, D R (2020) Taking a partnered approach to managing academic stress: An undergraduate study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16(4), pp. 251-269. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The ability to positively adapt to situations of stress and adversity enables student progress, growth, and learning. In the context of undergraduate building and construction education in the United States, little is known about the resources necessary for students to manage stressors associated with their studies. Twenty undergraduate building and construction students from a large, public land-grant university in the United States were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore the antecedents and impacts of academic stress, and deductive thematic analysis was used to identify resilience-building resources using the Resilience at University (RAU) framework. Resources identified to reduce stressor severity were focused on modifying the learning environment and implementing a scaffolded approach to learning and skills development. Resilient-building resources aligned with the six dimensions of the RAU were identified at the student level and the university level. An important contribution is the pivotal role of the student–university partnership in managing academic stress and building student resilience capability, acknowledging both students and the university as key actors. The findings will be of interest to educators and students who can implement a partnered approach to reduce the prevalence of academic stressors together with building students’ capacity to manage stress.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | college students; construction; resilience; stress; United States; wellbeing |
| Index terms: | partnership, college student, dimension, land, undergraduate, skills development, United States, stressors, well-being, construction education, thematic analysis |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, Geography, professional education, mental health and wellbeing, health monitoring assessment and metrics, real estate economics, personnel development, methods and analysis, sociology, health conditions and diseases, partnership management |
| Topics: | Education, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here