Hashem M. Mehany, M S; Killingsworth, J and Shah, S (2021) An evaluation of training delivery methods’ effects on construction safety training and knowledge retention - a foundational study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(1), pp. 18-36. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Despite significant efforts to ensure workers’ safety, the construction industry continues to observe high levels of injuries and fatalities. Many research efforts have identified hazard recognition as one of the main factors for a safer work environment, and safety training as its major improvement vehicle. In consideration of this issue, this foundational research is focused on understanding how effective the current training methods are. The training content, confined space safety, was specifically chosen as a more obscure topic than other common safety areas e.g. ladder safety. Participants among two different populations of students and industry professionals were tested to measure their ability to retain prompt safety information through four different training-delivery methods. The results were statistically analyzed to determine if there is a difference in participants’ knowledge retention based on which training-delivery method they received. Other variables were considered and analyzed such as education, construction experience, and safety training. Among the observed results, the study found no significance difference based on the training delivery methods. However, other factors were found significant to the participant’s safety knowledge retention such as long term learning and industry experience. Future studies were identified to build on the current research, and to include different languages.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; delivery modes or methods; safety education; training |
| Index terms: | work environment, future study, safety training, construction industry, fatalities, retention, delivery method, population, construction safety, injury |
| Subjects: | demography, research design and methodology, delivery method, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, environmental health, management, health risk and incident analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here