Exploring the potential of low cement concrete through a student concrete competition

Antoni, A; Yonathan, A; Suryo, H E; Felio, C; Ghozali, K E and Hardjito, D (2021) Exploring the potential of low cement concrete through a student concrete competition. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(1), pp. 37-51. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

A common method used to increase the strength of concrete is to add more cement to reduce the water-to-cement ratio. However, this is not always acceptable as adding more cement increases autogenous shrinkage, thermal and shrinkage cracking, and the cost of concrete production. By appropriately using superplasticizers, high-performance low cement concrete (LCC) can be produced. This study explores the potential of LCC by limiting cement content, adding alternative cementitious materials, and superplasticizers. Data was collected from the outcome of an annual National Student Concrete Competition conducted in Indonesia over three consecutive years. The new concept of LCC mix design was explained to all participants, i.e., civil engineering students, before they made their concrete specimens. Following the competition, all mixture compositions and their resulting concrete properties were analyzed. It was found that the participants’ knowledge on the use of superplasticizer and cementitious materials was the most notable challenge. Nevertheless, they discovered that making LCC is a possibility. Concrete with a compressive strength of 50 MPa (7252 psi) can be made using cement content as low as 200 kg/m3 (337 lb/yd3) with sufficient workability. Furthermore, the effect of several factors on the performance LCC is described in this study.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: calcium carbonate; concrete competition; fly ash; low cement; student competition; superplasticizer
Index terms: competition, workability, compressive strength, fly ash, mix design, superplasticizer, Indonesia
Subjects: Geography, market analysis, concrete and cementitious materials, materials science, building materials, design methods, material analysis and testing
Topics: Research Practice, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here