Evaluating the use of augmented reality technology to improve construction management student’s spatial skills

Kim, J and Irizarry, J (2021) Evaluating the use of augmented reality technology to improve construction management student’s spatial skills. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(2), pp. 99-116. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

There is a continual challenge within the construction industry to achieve schedule, budget, and quality expectations at a time when projects are more complex, and their design and assembly involve some measure of abstract spatial skills. The outcomes of teaching these spatial skills in today’s construction management classroom often fall short of meeting the needs of industry. This research advocates the use of augmented reality–which allows one to view the real world with the addition of external information intended to provide a new understanding of what is being seen. This study found that students perceived ease of effort and satisfaction by using augmented reality to help them with their spatial skills learning. In fact, it was discovered that the use of augmented reality benefited the cognitive process. Augmented reality is fast proving advantageous in many other industries, and with the availability of smaller, more powerful consumer mobile devices, augmented reality can become a practical tool for the construction industry as well. The addition of these technologies, as a complement to drafting and plan reading courses, can enhance postsecondary education, in addition to preparing the construction industry’s future workforce.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: active learning; augmented reality; construction education; construction technology; spatial skills; student learning
Index terms: construction industry, construction technology, drafting, active learning, satisfaction, classroom, construction education, augmented reality, perceived ease
Subjects: learning methods, project delivery, technical documentation, industry analysis, digital engineering, construction type, visualization, behavioral psychology, professional education
Topics: Project Management, Education, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here