Collins, W and Redden, L (2021) Improving student’s estimating abilities through experiential learning. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(2), pp. 117-132. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Experiential learning is a cyclical process whereby individuals learn from and build on past experiences. Typical construction estimating courses follow Kolb’s experiential learning theory process in a variety of ways, including leveraging various technologies. Technology integration, while valuable, lacks an authentic hands-on construction experience for students. This paper details a hands-on experiential learning activity related to concrete reinforcement and formwork conducted in a construction estimating course. The objective of the study was to discern the efficacy of hands-on exercise to foster student learning and promote course learning objectives. 102 students completed the exercise in four sections of the course during 2016 and 2017. The participants completed pre and post-exercise surveys regarding perceptions of their group’s estimate accuracy, and individual preparation in meeting certain course learning objectives. Statistical analysis of the survey results showed that students were overconfident of their abilities prior to completing the “field lab” exercise, and the survey analysis showed that course learning objectives were successfully promoted. The authors concluded that incorporation of a hands-on experiential learning exercise provides a true learning experience for the students that transcends activities typical of a construction estimating course. Future research should include incorporating similar activities into other areas of construction education.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction education; construction estimating; experiential learning |
| Index terms: | reinforcement, estimate, learning experience, exercise, statistical analysis, formwork, integration, construction education, construction estimating, estimating, experiential learning, survey, accuracy |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, professional development, building materials, financial and cost management, data science, data collection methods, learning methods, building construction, professional education, health behaviours and lifestyles |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Education, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here