Ghosh, S and Burghart, J (2021) Lean construction: Experience of us contractors. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(2), pp. 133-153. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
With the construction industry plagued with inefficiencies, Lean provides opportunities to identify and eliminate wastes in the construction processes and make them more efficient. Companies utilizing Lean have reported several benefits: improved reliability of outcome and profit margin, higher quality construction, greater customer satisfaction, and reduced costs and improved schedules. However, much of the current literature centers on the theories and benefits of Lean, with minimal attention to contractors’ experience. Increased familiarity and knowledge about Lean among the contractors and other stakeholders are vital as Lean construction practices are highly collaborative and need a culture change. To realize the improvement of efficiency of the construction industry, a widespread adoption of Lean is necessary. To gain insight on contractors’ experience with Lean, a survey was conducted among the top 200 contractors of the United States listed by Engineering News-Record(ENR) through an online survey of structured questions. The findings of this study support the fact that Lean is growing as an important component of construction operations and provides benchmarks to measure the evolution of Lean practice in construction firms over time and across different sectors. This study provides important insights that inform the practitioners about the experience and level of Lean familiarity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractors lean experience; lean construction; lean experience; lean practices |
| Index terms: | profit, construction firm, survey, United States, lean construction, practitioner, evolution, construction process, construction operation, efficiency, construction industry, customer satisfaction |
| Subjects: | organization, practitioner, economic analysis, environmental science, construction operations, Geography, building construction, data collection methods, performance management, service delivery, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here