Debs, L and Shaurette, M (2021) An exploration of telephone and e-mail communications for design-related construction problems. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(2), pp. 154-177. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is a fragmented one that relies on the collaboration of diverse stakeholders for the success of a project. Many times, stakeholders involved in the process are scattered in physical locations distant from the jobsite, making communication through media such as telephone and e-mail necessary, instead of face-to-face communication. Specific features of these communication media often affect how accurately information is conveyed from one party to another. This paper seeks to understand the benefits and challenges of telephone and e-mail communication and how they influence communications between site supervision and design personnel to help construction students and recent graduates to improve their communication and collaboration skills. Interviews with professionals were held and a quasi-experiment with students and professionals was performed as a two-phased, sequential study. Results indicate an alignment with Media Synchronicity Theory while also showing how the influence of the AEC industry-specific context, such as project-related record-keeping, influences the choice of media. From these results, a summary table and a set of guidelines for effective communication are presented to help students and young professionals become aware of media limitations so that they can effectively communicate in the AEC industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collaboration; communication; design problem-solving; e-mail; telephone |
| Index terms: | experiment, personnel, exploration, supervision, face, media, e-mail, interview, collaboration |
| Subjects: | management, data collection methods, psychology, environmental resource management, communication, control systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here