Somiah, M K; Aigbavboa, C and Thwala, W D (2021) Rethinking the attributes for competitive advantage of indigenous construction firms in developing countries: A Ghana study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(3), pp. 242-257. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Though studies in the past have advanced some attributes for competitive advantage in certain national contexts, little is known of the empirical studies that identify the principal attributes for competitive advantage of indigenous construction firms in developing countries to adduce empirical findings toward firms’ competitive advantage policy. This study identifies the principal and sub attributes for competitive advantage of indigenous construction firms in developing countries using Ghana as a case study. The use of principal component analysis, varimax rotation in data analysis aided in reducing the large set of attributes to four principal components. Using a questionnaire survey, 667 respondents were invited to rate 21 attributes identified from literature and structured interview based on their knowledge and/or experience. Correlations between the 21 variables showed that four principal components underlay the attributes for competitive advantage of indigenous construction firms: firms’ internal factors, firm-industry conditions, collaborations, and firm owners’ competencies and influence. It was also revealed that 4 out of the 21 attributes were peculiar to Ghana only. Findings and recommendations of this study may be useful for industry stakeholders who are seeking innovative ways to enhance indigenous construction firms’ competitive advantage, pedagogy, and curriculum review.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitive advantage; construction industry; developing countries; education; Ghana |
| Index terms: | Ghana, owner, case study, indigenous construction firm, competitive advantage, construction industry, pedagogy, empirical study, principal component analysis, survey, data analysis, developing country, interview, questionnaire, collaboration |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, Geography, development economics, research methods, market analysis, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, teaching methods, management, industry analysis, statistical analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, International Construction, Geographical Context, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here