Farrow, C B and Wetzel, E (2021) An active learning classroom in construction management education: Student perceptions of engagement and learning. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(4), pp. 299-317. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Learning spaces that engage students actively are becoming more common. Active learning spaces are designed to facilitate collaboration between students as they engage in problem solving, communication, and teamwork. Recently, Auburn University installed an active learning space in the construction management teaching facility which provided a dedicated active learning space for construction education. During the 2018–19 academic year, students were surveyed to better understand their perspectives on the learning environment after having a class in the space. The goals of this exploratory study focused on student experiences within the active learning environment including perceived impact on learning and engagement within construction education. Sixty-eight percent of the students surveyed believed their learning and 82% believed their engagement with the material was enhanced by the space, the teaching tactics, and shared engagement. Results indicated that while the majority of students expressed positive experiences in areas of “group work and collaboration” and the “engaging and interactive” nature of the class, some construction students found the space distracting particularly when traditional lecture teaching was employed. Overall, the active construction management classroom can enhance the quality of students’ experience through appropriate course design and enriched dialogue, and a potential to positively improve the quality of construction education exists.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | active learning; classroom design; construction education; pedagogy; student engagement |
| Index terms: | teamwork, becoming, student experience, learning space, active learning, pedagogy, student engagement, exploratory study, construction management education, problem solving, classroom, construction education, collaboration |
| Subjects: | learning methods, teaching methods, management, student development, construction type, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, philosophical process, professional education |
| Topics: | Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here