Sidoli del Ceno, J (2012) A process account of construction mediation. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
This paper seeks to argue that construction mediation has hitherto been viewed and evaluated in a relatively narrow fashion. It suggests that while there are numerous and well-known benefits to the process, although these are not always accepted by all academics or practitioners, in such things as the speed of the potential settlement and lower cost implications there are other valuable benefits, benefits that tend not to be considered but have real value. The central claim is that construction mediation has the potential to become a transformative process. It argues that greater emphasis ought to be placed on the 'process' of dispute resolution and the attendant benefits that can result in the construction professional undergoing a developmental and maturing experience through engagement with mediation. These benefits ought to be then considered alongside other, more traditional accounts, of the strengths and weaknesses of mediation. The argument will be developed through reference to currently recognized models of mediation. It will conclude that through the use of mediation in dispute resolution the construction professional can develop both a range of important attributes such as more developed communication skills as well as important mental and social attitudes that can engender empowerment and may serve as an aid to cultural change in the industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | mediation; education; professional practice; transformation |
| Index terms: | transformation, dispute, mediation, empowerment, professional practice, resolution, cultural change, communication skill, practitioner, construction professional |
| Subjects: | practitioner, dispute resolution, business, sociology, conflict resolution, professional development, management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Information Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here