Hashem M. Mehany, M S and Gebken, R (2021) Assessing the importance and cognition level of acce’s student learning outcomes: Industry, educator, and student perceptions. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(4), pp. 333-351. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
In 2014, the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE), the leading accreditation body for construction degree programs, formally approved new student learning outcome (SLO) based standards. As degree programs across the country begin to adopt these guidelines, it is important to assess the ability of these SLOs to address the needed knowledge base for new college graduates. This study is an attempt to gauge perceptions of ACCE’s Bachelor Degree SLOs and identify similarities and/or differences in both topic importance and cognition level recommendations between industry practitioners, faculty, and students. The data indicate that while there is strong alignment within each stakeholder group, there are few areas of agreement on topic importance between groups outside of the top and bottom ranking items. These include the highest importance being assigned to analyzing construction documents for planning and management of construction processes; and, the lowest importance generally being sustainable principles and surveying. The data also indicate that there is generally strong agreement between all stakeholders on the cognition levels for most SLOs. Lastly, the data reveal that there is no correlation between an SLO’s perceived importance and its expected cognition level–an indicator that there is no association between knowledge breadth and depth.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | alignment; American council for construction education; construction education; perceptions; student learning outcomes |
| Index terms: | construction process, construction education, cognition, program, practitioner, documents, college graduate, knowledge base, surveying, learning outcome |
| Subjects: | professional education, cognitive psychology, building construction, practitioner, sociology, information systems, student development, software systems, professional development, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Education, Health and Safety, Site Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here