An empirical analysis of issue management in small building construction projects

Shalwani, A and Lines, B C (2021) An empirical analysis of issue management in small building construction projects. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 17(4), pp. 352-372. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Public institutions seek to maintain their built-environment assets by allocating sizable budgets to small construction projects that renovate or expand upon existing facilities. Small building projects can encounter many issues, which must be effectively managed by the project team to avoid negative performance outcomes. Yet relatively little research has investigated issue management within small building projects. This study’s objectives were to quantify the frequency with which various issues arise during the construction phase and to identify the timing of the project team’s corresponding actions to manage each issue. The study’s dataset consisted of 881 small building projects, including 5,236 individual issues that the project teams identified, monitored, and resolved during the construction phase. Results show that the most frequently occurring issues were designer and owner related. Design errors and omissions and unforeseen concealed conditions were typically identified and resolved the earliest in the schedule, whereas contractor-related issues were typically the last to be identified and resolved. Owner scope changes and unforeseeable events required the longest monitoring periods before the resolution was reached. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying the most frequent issues and the timing with which they were identified, resolved, and monitored by the project team.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost and schedule performance; design-bid-build; issue management; project management; small building projects
Index terms: resolution, construction project, building construction, construction phase, owner, project management, scope change, designer, schedule performance, dataset, body of knowledge, design error, performance outcome, design-bid-build, project team, monitoring
Subjects: sociology, building construction, conflict resolution, data management, professional practice, value management, control systems, project delivery, production management, knowledge management, project controls, project management theory and practice, scope management, profession, contractual arrangements
Topics: Construction Technology, Site Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here